The pitch is clean. For roughly $10 a month, a company called DeleteMe will go to all the websites that have collected and resold your name, address, phone number, age, and family relationships, and it will ask them to remove your information. Then it will check again every quarter, because new sites pop up and old data gets re-syndicated. After a year of subscription, the company says, your name on the internet is meaningfully smaller than it was.
For about $7.50 a month, a service called Incogni does roughly the same thing but pitches it differently — focused more on opting you out of the broker industry’s underlying data flows, less on individual sites. For about $5 a month, Optery does it with a different mix of automation versus human-in-the-loop. There are perhaps a dozen other services in this space, with various flavors and price points. The category, broadly, is called “data-removal services” or sometimes “personal-information removal.”
The pitch is appealing enough that the category has grown rapidly — analyst estimates put it as a multi-billion-dollar consumer market by the end of the decade. The pitch is also confusing enough that people sign up without quite knowing what they’re paying for. I want to walk through what these services actually do, what they can and can’t accomplish, and how to think about whether one is worth the money.
What these services actually do
If you’ve never thought about it, the U.S. consumer-data ecosystem is built around several hundred “data brokers” — companies whose business is collecting personal information from public records, social media, marketing databases, and a constellation of other sources, then aggregating and reselling it. Some of these brokers are well-known (Acxiom, LexisNexis, Spokeo). Most are unfamiliar names that operate “people-search” sites with names like “BeenVerified,” “Whitepages,” “TruePeopleSearch,” “MyLife,” “Radaris,” “Intelius,” “PeopleFinder,” and roughly seventy others in active operation.
You probably haven’t given any of these sites your information directly. You don’t have to. They’ve assembled it from public records (property deeds, court filings, voter rolls, marriage licenses), commercial sources (your credit-card transactions get sold in aggregated form), and scraped data (your old MySpace profile, your LinkedIn page when it was set to public, your relatives’ Facebook posts that mention you). The result is a profile available for purchase, often free to view (because the business model is “let people see a teaser, then upsell them on the full report”), with information that is sometimes startlingly specific: your home address, your phone number, your age, your relatives, your prior addresses, sometimes a rough income estimate, sometimes the make of your car.
Each of these sites is, in most U.S. states, legally required to honor an opt-out request. The federal regulation is loose; California (CCPA), Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and a growing list of other states have stronger laws specifically about this category. The opt-out process exists, but each site has its own form, its own verification requirements (sometimes a notarized letter, sometimes just an email confirmation), its own timeline (some respond in days, some in weeks, some quietly never), and its own habit of slowly re-adding your information later.
What DeleteMe, Incogni, Optery, and the others do is run that opt-out process for you, at scale, repeatedly. They maintain a list of sites to check. They submit removal requests. They follow up. They re-submit when sites quietly re-add your information. They produce quarterly reports showing what was removed and where.
That is, fundamentally, the entire offering. There’s no magic. There’s no “the company knows secret URLs to delete things.” It is automation and grunt work applied to a process you could do yourself, manually, if you had thirty hours a quarter to spend on it.
What they can and can’t do
Can:
- Remove your information from most U.S. people-search sites (DeleteMe and Optery both publish lists of the sites they cover; usually 100-200+ sites)
- Re-check periodically and re-submit when sites re-add your data
- Save you a substantial amount of tedious manual work
- Provide quarterly reports so you can see what was done
Can’t:
- Remove your information from sites they don’t have a process for (the long tail of smaller brokers)
- Remove your information from sites operated outside their primary jurisdiction (most cover U.S. brokers thoroughly, EU brokers patchily, others rarely)
- Prevent your information from re-appearing as it gets re-collected from public sources (every quarter, the cycle starts again)
- Remove information from sites that, by design, refuse opt-out requests (some genuinely don’t have a process; some have one but ignore it)
- Touch the upstream data sources that brokers re-collect from (your county property records, your social media, the marketing databases). They treat symptoms, not cause.
This last point matters. If you opt out of every U.S. people-search site today, in six months your information will be back on a meaningful number of them, because the underlying aggregation process keeps producing it. The service value is in the re-checking and re-submitting, not in any one removal being permanent.
How the major services differ
Pricing varies, the mechanics are mostly the same, but a few real differences are worth understanding:
DeleteMe (Abine) is the oldest and most established. They cover a moderate number of sites (~30-50 actively, with claim of more). Pricing starts around $129/year for individual; $229 for couples; family plans available. Reports are detailed and quarterly. The interface is dated but functional. Their staff includes humans who handle edge cases (notarized requests, etc.) — important for the sites that don’t accept fully-automated submissions.
Incogni (a Surfshark/Nord Security sister company) launched in 2022 and grew quickly. Their pitch emphasizes the broader data-broker ecosystem (data aggregators, not just people-search sites). They claim 180+ brokers covered. Pricing around $7-13/month depending on annual vs monthly. Slick interface. The fact that they’re owned by the same parent as NordVPN is something to know — not a deal-breaker, but a single-point-of-trust consideration.
Optery (Optery Inc.) takes a more transparent approach. Their free tier actually scans for your information across many sites and shows you where you appear (you do the removal manually). Their paid tiers ($4-25/month depending on tier) progressively add more automated removals. Optery publishes its coverage list openly and discloses which sites are automated vs manual. For people who want to understand exactly what they’re paying for, Optery is the most transparent option.
Kanary (smaller company, recently acquired) and PrivacyDuck (slightly more boutique, focused on white-glove service for high-net-worth individuals) round out the better-known options.
For most people, the practical choice is between DeleteMe, Incogni, and Optery. Differences in coverage and price are real but small. Mechanics are similar.
Is it worth the money?
This is the question that should determine whether you sign up.
The honest answer: it depends on how visible you currently are, how much your time is worth, and whether you care about the long tail.
You probably want one of these services if:
- You’re a public figure (journalist, executive, politician, public-facing professional) where having your home address easily Googlable is a real safety concern
- You’ve been doxxed or stalked previously and want to make it harder for it to happen again
- You’re going through a life transition (divorce, custody case, new job in a sensitive field) where someone might be motivated to look you up
- You make $100K+ per year and the service costs less than two hours of your time
- You’ve tried to opt out manually once and discovered it’s a 30-hour project per round
You probably don’t need one of these services if:
- You’re not very visible online to begin with (no public profiles, common name, no professional reason to be findable)
- You’re under 25 and don’t have a long paper trail yet
- The cost ($120-200/year) is meaningful to you and the alternative use of that money matters more
- You’re willing and able to spend a couple of weekends doing manual opt-outs once a year
The middle ground — most adults — is genuinely a judgment call. The service does something useful. It is not transformative. The privacy improvement from a year of DeleteMe is real but quiet. You won’t suddenly feel safer; you’ll just notice, after a while, that your name is no longer the first result for some queries that used to surface it.
A practical alternative path
If you want to try the manual route first to see how much improvement you can make on your own:
- Go to Inteltechniques’ workbook (free PDF). It has step-by-step removal instructions for the major sites.
- Spend a Saturday morning working through the top 20 sites. Most have a form-submission flow that takes 5-10 minutes per site.
- Set a calendar reminder for 90 days later to re-check.
If after one round you decide the work is too much to keep up with, that’s the point at which paying $10/month for one of the services starts to feel obviously worth it.
If after one round you find that most of the removals stick and the time wasn’t bad, you’ve discovered that you didn’t need the service after all.
Either outcome is informative.
What I’d watch for
This category is young enough that some of the marketing claims should be treated with caution:
- “Removes you from 500+ sites!” claims are often inflated. Look for specific lists of covered sites, not aggregate numbers.
- “AI-powered” framing is mostly marketing. The work is regulatory compliance, not machine learning.
- Lifetime subscription offers are usually a bad deal — the company has incentive to underdeliver after the upfront payment.
- Bundled with VPN / antivirus offerings are fine but evaluate the components separately. A great VPN with a mediocre data-removal add-on is worse than two separately-chosen good products.
Coming in the full review
We’re working on a comparative review that will include:
- Real opt-out submissions to a sample of brokers, tracked end-to-end through each service
- Removal-success rates per service over a 6-month window
- Quality of the quarterly reports
- Customer support response times when an edge case arises
- Realistic comparison vs the manual approach using the Inteltechniques workbook
For now, if you’ve decided you want one of these services, our preliminary picks are: DeleteMe if you want the most established player and don’t mind the older interface; Optery if you want maximum transparency about what’s covered; Incogni if Surfshark/Nord ecosystem alignment doesn’t bother you and you want the slickest UX.
DeleteMe direct · Optery direct · Incogni direct
*The above are direct product links, not affiliate. Affiliate links will be added once we’ve completed the comparative review and selected partners.
—
Inteltechniques is run by Michael Bazzell, a former federal investigator and the author of Open Source Intelligence Techniques. The free workbook is genuinely thorough.